Aaaaaaaaaaarrrrrrrrrrrrgggggggggggggghhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh!
You blew it!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
The time limit applies
only to the person who asked the quote
you had just answered, namely Caroline!
Not to you! Of course you know the answer to your
own question!!!!
I should have made that clearer, but I did not expect Caroline to mention that rule, nor your reacting thus to her mentioning it.
The rule is to prevent the game from becoming a two-person one ("ping-pong") with two players exchanging quotes rapidly without anyone having a chance to "put a line in sidewise".
This one has already been asked!
So for the first five days anyone may answer except the person who asked the previous quote (Caroline in this case). After 5 days, this person is allowed to answer, but the asker of the quote (you in this case) is never allowed at all, of course!!!!
Then (or even
before the 5 days have passed, but not before 3-4 days, let us say), if there is no answer, the asker can give hints. If after giving 3 or 4 hints over 2-3
weeks (the limit is not strict) there is still no answer, then by common consensus the quote is called "cold". Then another one is offered (either by the person who aked the quote that just got cold or someone else) but
still the asker does not answer it but leaves it for indeterminate time. If someone finds it even years later, (s)he
still gets a full sherlock, but of course solving a cold quote does not allow to ask a new question, the next question being asked by whoever answers the quite which is "active" at a given point of time.
This puts us in an unprecedented situation. On the other hand, there are not so many of us, so we can reach a consensus. I think we should collectively act as umpires, this concerns the regular players of
this game more than the administrators of hte whole site.
Caroline, did you actually have the correct answer?
If you answer positively, does any of us, namely Suzette, James, Blackwing, risi if she is still around, Reede Kullervo (ditto), Ragua if (s)he (?) is still around, marcyb (ditto again), or even unfrequent players, Ghost, gollum... anyone I have forgotten... object to trusting her and keep the game going as if she had actually answered (I do not object)? Or should Kurt ask a new one? (then I think Carloine should at least be dispensed from the 5-days rule and allowed to answer immediately)
Edit
BTW since we are discussing rules:
Kurt (is it OK to call you so? your full username is too long, but we ca nuse your real name, like SPetty/Suzette, JKCade/James, or call you KM like RK for Reede Kulervo) one can ask optional bonus questions in addition. Answering bonus is worth half a sherlock and does not allow to posrt a new quote. Thus if the bous is not a spoiler for the main question there is no 5-days rule for it. The perso nwho asks the bonus should normally make that clear. Even if the bonus is a spoiler if the correct answer to a question is given before 5 days, the person who asked the previous question can answer the bonus immediately after, no need to wait till the completion of the 5 days. Old, cold bonuses ca nof course be answered at any time by everyone, even the person whose question is active.
There are at the present no unanswered old questions worth a full sherlocks, but there are two unsanswered cold bonuses, worth 1/2 sherlock each. One by me, one by Caroline. Here they are, for you to solve if you want (and can
)
viewtopic.php?p=1840978#1840978
the genus is Panthera; there are no more tigresses (I think) but there are (at least) three more instances, for two different female animals of the Panthera genus. I want two instances, whether of the same species or not.
The main question was about Elli compared to a tigress in _EoA_, that was answered long ago.
and this one by Caroline
viewtopic.php?p=1858361#1858361