anyone with a different copy to mine actually know what this should say ?Why would anyone start an attack and then leave as soon as they she pinked his arm
Proofreading
- Kvetch
- Sweeper
- Posts: 11844
- Joined: Tue Apr 20, 2004 2:12 pm
- Location: North of the Sun and East of Chaos
- Contact:
Proofreading
while reading Towers of the sunset I came across this rather garbled sentence (at the end of chapter 5)
"I'm the family radical. The rest are terribly stuffy. Aside from Aunt - she's just odd."
Typo
It should say "she"...
No matter how hard we try [and between 3 and 6 editors, et al, look at a manuscript after I submit it, and I get two more looks] ... some typos inevitably still slip through.
L. E. Modesitt, Jr.
No matter how hard we try [and between 3 and 6 editors, et al, look at a manuscript after I submit it, and I get two more looks] ... some typos inevitably still slip through.
L. E. Modesitt, Jr.
- MidasKnight
- Centrist
- Posts: 4157
- Joined: Mon Dec 15, 2003 2:06 pm
- Location: Folsom, CA
- RecluceMage
- Devoted Scholar
- Posts: 892
- Joined: Thu Apr 29, 2004 11:32 am
- Location: Santa Rosa, CA
- Contact:
Editing isn't just about good grammer, spelling, etc. That part isn't difficult, what is challenging is deciding what content should be in the book, what shouldn't, etc. I know of several of Mr. Modesitt's books that were supposed to be only one book, but because of an editor's say it is now two books, and forced us all to wait an extra two years for the conclusion to one of the Recluce stories.
Now imagine - if you will - that you are an editor and are handed a manuscript by a very young and promising writer who has yet to learn the finer points of story telling. You are responsible for seeing to the content of the story, and informing him that, perhaps, a talking fantastical animal may not be the best way to go for that character, or that the "evil twin" idea has really been used too many times already. Not that we have to worry about that too much from Mr. Modesitt's books...
Now imagine - if you will - that you are an editor and are handed a manuscript by a very young and promising writer who has yet to learn the finer points of story telling. You are responsible for seeing to the content of the story, and informing him that, perhaps, a talking fantastical animal may not be the best way to go for that character, or that the "evil twin" idea has really been used too many times already. Not that we have to worry about that too much from Mr. Modesitt's books...
- Kvetch
- Sweeper
- Posts: 11844
- Joined: Tue Apr 20, 2004 2:12 pm
- Location: North of the Sun and East of Chaos
- Contact:
really, we should all get jobs as PROOF READERS - much better idea - you get to be anal about grammar and formatting and stuff, but don't have to make editorial decisions !
how about it Mr Modesitt? - why don't you send us proof copies, and we'll catch all the weird bits. Free of charge too.
how about it Mr Modesitt? - why don't you send us proof copies, and we'll catch all the weird bits. Free of charge too.
"I'm the family radical. The rest are terribly stuffy. Aside from Aunt - she's just odd."
- RecluceMage
- Devoted Scholar
- Posts: 892
- Joined: Thu Apr 29, 2004 11:32 am
- Location: Santa Rosa, CA
- Contact:
- Kvetch
- Sweeper
- Posts: 11844
- Joined: Tue Apr 20, 2004 2:12 pm
- Location: North of the Sun and East of Chaos
- Contact:
wouldn't it be cool though - It's the sci-fi/fan fans who are most likely to catch the mistakes because :
a) they know what the books are talking about and will catch the narrative errors (in my copy of the Crossroads of Twilight, it talks about the true source when it should say the one source - an irritating error that a proofreader who didn't know what was going on in the series would never get, but is perfectly obvious if you have read the preceeding books [please don't hurt me for reading Robert Jordan])
b) are the anal types who actually know the difference between stanch and staunch and other words
and, to convince the worshipers of Lucre;
c) would work for free (or the sheer pleasure of reading good authors...)
a) they know what the books are talking about and will catch the narrative errors (in my copy of the Crossroads of Twilight, it talks about the true source when it should say the one source - an irritating error that a proofreader who didn't know what was going on in the series would never get, but is perfectly obvious if you have read the preceeding books [please don't hurt me for reading Robert Jordan])
b) are the anal types who actually know the difference between stanch and staunch and other words
and, to convince the worshipers of Lucre;
c) would work for free (or the sheer pleasure of reading good authors...)
"I'm the family radical. The rest are terribly stuffy. Aside from Aunt - she's just odd."
Proofing
Several years ago, a professional proofreader who is also a F&SF fan and reader offered to proof my books for free to catch those annoying errors. My publisher declined the offer. For logistical reasons, that's not something that an author can do during that stage of production. I have less than 10 days in which to proof the galleys [at times, I've had only three].
So... we have to do the best we can. I know that's not ideal, but publishing is a business, and if they don't publish, I can't write, and you can't read what I write.
L. E. Modesitt, Jr.
So... we have to do the best we can. I know that's not ideal, but publishing is a business, and if they don't publish, I can't write, and you can't read what I write.
L. E. Modesitt, Jr.
Re: Proofing
I don't think I've ever found an author with multiple books published that didn't have the occasional spelling or grammar error. Personally, as long as they are infrequent enough that they don't interfere with the story, I don't care about them.lmodesitt wrote:So... we have to do the best we can. I know that's not ideal, but publishing is a business, and if they don't publish, I can't write, and you can't read what I write.
In fact, although I have found the occasional error in LEM's books, I'd much prefer that he (as well as his editors and publishers) continue to focus his/their efforts to maintain the prolific pace at which they currently release his novels. After all, I read his books for their value as entertaining and thought provoking literature. If I was interested in perfect linguistic correctness, I'd read a dictionary instead.
Others are, of course, welcome to their own opinion on the matter, but that's mine.
Spelling and grammar are relatively modest aspects of the responsibilities involved with being a good Editor for professional writers.Do editors make very much money? I'm sure Brad and I would be very good at it ...
I've occasionally been pressed into informal (read that as 'unpaid') service proofreading early drafts for various acquaintances, and it's not nearly as easy or trivial as you might think. In any case, what I did was more of a preliminary task to, rather than a replacement of, professional editing.
Aside from the fact that I don't have a degree in English, it's not for me. I'm already gainfully employed as an Engineer anyway, so it's moot.
- Ron Lambert
- Bookworm
- Posts: 42
- Joined: Thu May 06, 2004 4:46 pm
- Location: Troy, Michigan USA
I have read more than half of the 46 or so books that LEM has produced in the past 13 years (quite a prodigious output!), and I only notice one or two typos per book. That is not bad. It certainly could be worse--like the Bible publisher a couple of hundred years ago who left out the word "not" in the eighth commandment, so that it read: "Thou shalt steal." He just barely escaped being thrown in jail!
I actually enjoy the typos. Why you might ask...because they usually make me smile, are incredibly rare, and they make me feel special. Because I have seen them, and know that others have also. I guess it's sort of like coin collecting, it's the errors that make a coin rare more often than anything else. Besides which, it gives me hopes. Even LEM's posts are better composed then most of my well thought out business writing. Knowing that occasionally he has a typo, or even and editing goof escape him gives me hope for my own writing. Not to say I will ever venture into the terrifying field of writing fiction.
- MidasKnight
- Centrist
- Posts: 4157
- Joined: Mon Dec 15, 2003 2:06 pm
- Location: Folsom, CA
Well, I am 'proofing' a book for my step-father (Major Mitchell, he's in our database ) and I find I want to rearrange a lot of things. It is a fine line between editing and rewriting. I have to ask myself if I'm about to redline something because I wouldn't write it that way or if it really should be written differently.
In the 60’s, people took acid to make the world weird. Now the world is weird and people take Prozac to make it normal.
I'm an aspiring/amature writer myself and proof reading has to be one of the most tedious and time consuming tasks in the entire process, especially if you don't do it often enough to know how to scan effectively. I've been through a draft for a short story of mine at least four times and still a mistake shows up that I completely missed. It's best to print out the draft and look at it on paper rather than a screen. Also, reviewing your own work has it's problems. I tend to get caught up in nit-picking little details and completely forget I'm only looking for spelling, grammar, and punctuation errors. Also, I find my thoughts wandering into some story point and I don't really see what I'm reading. I get done and then think back, what did I just do. It takes more concentration than one would think.
Namari,
Jaxom
Jaxom
- Ron Lambert
- Bookworm
- Posts: 42
- Joined: Thu May 06, 2004 4:46 pm
- Location: Troy, Michigan USA
I kind of hate to mention it, but since we are talking about proofreading, the word is spelled "amateur," not "amature." I have found that one of the keys to good spelling is the willingness to spend the slight time and energy it takes to look up words if I have any question about how they are spelled. And it is not a "Catch-22" situation. I don't have to know how to spell words correctly to begin with before I can look them up. The Merriam-Webster Online Dictrionary allows me to input the word the way I think it might be spelled, and it will tell me if it is not a word (like it does when I enter "amature") and give a list of suggested possibilities that I might mean. "Amateur" heads the list. Here is the link for the Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary: http://www.m-w.com/netdict.htm
Jaxom92, if you are an amateur writer, come over to the volleyball thread and have some fun.
If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude than the animating contest of freedom, go from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains sit lightly upon you,
S Adams
S Adams
- CodeBlower
- Shakespearean Groupie
- Posts: 1752
- Joined: Sun Jun 25, 2006 12:27 am
- Location: IL, USA
- Contact:
This thread's a little dated, I see, but this seems like the appropriate place to ask ..
I found (what I believe to be) a couple proofreading errors in "Natural Ordermage".
If we submit these, is there a feedback-loop that gets them corrected for the next reprinting?
Or, are they just useful as subject-matter for playful banter between forum-members?
(thanks)
As a side-note: if/when this whole "internet publishing eliminates the middle-man" thing finally takes off, I'd like to join the long list of people who get early access to .. um .. er .. of volunteers for the position of proofreader.
I found (what I believe to be) a couple proofreading errors in "Natural Ordermage".
If we submit these, is there a feedback-loop that gets them corrected for the next reprinting?
Or, are they just useful as subject-matter for playful banter between forum-members?
(thanks)
As a side-note: if/when this whole "internet publishing eliminates the middle-man" thing finally takes off, I'd like to join the long list of people who get early access to .. um .. er .. of volunteers for the position of proofreader.
"Budge up, yeh great lump." -- Hagrid, HP:SS
-=-
The gelding is what the gelding is, unlike people who change in response to their perceptions of events that may benefit or threaten their power. -- Lorn, Chapter LXXXII, Magi'i of Cyador
-=-
The gelding is what the gelding is, unlike people who change in response to their perceptions of events that may benefit or threaten their power. -- Lorn, Chapter LXXXII, Magi'i of Cyador
Proofreading
I gratefully accept any proofing corrections... BUT... for them to be included in the paperback copy, I need to get them 4-5 months before the paperback comes out.
So... alas, it's too late for the paperback of Natural Ordermage.
L. E. Modesitt, Jr.
So... alas, it's too late for the paperback of Natural Ordermage.
L. E. Modesitt, Jr.
- CodeBlower
- Shakespearean Groupie
- Posts: 1752
- Joined: Sun Jun 25, 2006 12:27 am
- Location: IL, USA
- Contact:
That's cool. Since my experiment with delaying the purchase of "Natural Ordermage" to reduce my wait for "Mage-Guard of Hamor" largely failed, I should be a little more timely with future feedback.
"Budge up, yeh great lump." -- Hagrid, HP:SS
-=-
The gelding is what the gelding is, unlike people who change in response to their perceptions of events that may benefit or threaten their power. -- Lorn, Chapter LXXXII, Magi'i of Cyador
-=-
The gelding is what the gelding is, unlike people who change in response to their perceptions of events that may benefit or threaten their power. -- Lorn, Chapter LXXXII, Magi'i of Cyador
- CodeBlower
- Shakespearean Groupie
- Posts: 1752
- Joined: Sun Jun 25, 2006 12:27 am
- Location: IL, USA
- Contact:
Re: Proofreading
(hopefully this is early enough - haven't noticed any others so far ..)lmodesitt wrote:I gratefully accept any proofing corrections... BUT... for them to be included in the paperback copy, I need to get them 4-5 months before the paperback comes out.
Viewpoints Critical
Iron Man, Plastic Ships
#1 - page 86
McCaine checked his instruments. Angel Two hadn't lined up his braking thrusts exactly. Probably misaligned instruments, though McCaine.
I think "though" probably should be "thought".
#2 - page 90
"Both Admiral Reagan and Heatherton agreed that you made an impossible recovery, especially with a defective and untested rug".
I think "rug" should be "tug".
"Budge up, yeh great lump." -- Hagrid, HP:SS
-=-
The gelding is what the gelding is, unlike people who change in response to their perceptions of events that may benefit or threaten their power. -- Lorn, Chapter LXXXII, Magi'i of Cyador
-=-
The gelding is what the gelding is, unlike people who change in response to their perceptions of events that may benefit or threaten their power. -- Lorn, Chapter LXXXII, Magi'i of Cyador
-
- Scribe
- Posts: 189
- Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2005 9:31 pm
- Location: Eastern Washington University, Cheney, WA
Re: Proofreading
Viewpoints Critical
Black Ordermage
page 140
I was definitely no ancient, ancient or modern, or...
I think the first "ancient" is supposed to be "angel".
Black Ordermage
page 140
I was definitely no ancient, ancient or modern, or...
I think the first "ancient" is supposed to be "angel".