
I Am Legend
Moderator: clong
We will miss youMidasKnight wrote:Therefore, I will not likely be participating in the discussion.
There was a conflict for me with the science. Neville started as a non-scientist, I think. Everything he did to study the bacteria was self taught. It almost seemed that he felt that the germ theory was in question. In the 1950s Pasteur and other germ pioneers were 100 years in the past. I think that kept the book from fitting well into the genre of science fiction. But, my memory of the classification of Matheson's work was that it fit more commonly into horror than science fiction. I am Legend certainly has elements of science fiction. Set 20 years in Matheson's future, it follows a barely acknowledged war (atomic?) which caused mutation in bugs (and mutation certainly plays into the ending).clong wrote:understand what has happened and to use science to look for solutions.
I liked exactly this. Rather than scientist as hero(as you often see in science fiction of that era), we get an everyman confronted by the inexplicable who tries to teach himself how to understand.Algot Runeman wrote:There was a conflict for me with the science. Neville started as a non-scientist, I think. Everything he did to study the bacteria was self taught. It almost seemed that he felt that the germ theory was in question. In the 1950s Pasteur and other germ pioneers were 100 years in the past. I think that kept the book from fitting well into the genre of science fiction. But, my memory of the classification of Matheson's work was that it fit more commonly into horror than science fiction. I am Legend certainly has elements of science fiction. Set 20 years in Matheson's future, it follows a barely acknowledged war (atomic?) which caused mutation in bugs (and mutation certainly plays into the ending).clong wrote:understand what has happened and to use science to look for solutions.
I don't think that Matheson is suggesting that Neville became an expert (and in fact we don't really even know if his theories are right). Again, I like the idea that you might pick up a biology 101 textbook and read it and think about it and try to develop a plan of action from it. I find that a much improved course of action over just getting drunk waiting for death.MidasKnight wrote: I found his scientific efforts to be less believable than the idea of vampires. I mean, what layman can actually learn a profession just through books? That, to me, is fantasy, not sci fi.
Yes I think this is it. Future generations of eventually civilized next gen humans will talk about the monster that haunted the first generation that tried to rebuild after the plague. And scare their children with the idea that another such monster will get them if they don't behave. Or something like that. One species' monster is another species just trying to survive.I'm not sure I understand the title unless it is that the tables have turned and the vampires are afraid of him now ... aka ... he's the legend?
But he did make this distinction between the living and the undead throughout the book...It is only at the end that you understand the implication.The whole idea of a new culture of 'alive' vampires seemed to be quite sudden. I mean, I realize Neville was isolated for 3 or 4 years but it still seemed contrived and rushed